kenderstest

This has nothing to do with the tsunami. What the link in the title leads to is a hidden danger. Government cover-ups of this have gone on for years. We need to stop this people, immediately. Click on the link and read this website!!!! Write your elected representatives. For God's sake, if you don't help who will?

To the very few people that wander by this humble blog may your holiday be bright and warm. Keep those in your thoughts that are far from home and family, although most likely not far from loved ones, and pray they come home safe.



As my friend Redneck Guru posted:



"There is no greater love than this: to lay down one’s life for one’s friends.” (John 15:12-13)





Keep safe and be of good cheer and stolid faith that all will be right in the end.



Merry Christmas

Blessed Yule

Happy Chanukah

Bright Kwanzaa

and Bless You All.



(did I get everyone?)

As you know, I believe that the far left, in concert with the ACLU, is taking this country down the wrong road. A road leading, at best, to socialism and at worst to communism. A road that our Founding FATHERS, (none of this PC crap about founding "framers") would have found abhorrant. A road that they would have considered as being traitorous and those on it would have been worthy of hanging for their crimes against us.



So let me propose Plan "D".......a plan that is so devious that it would be worthy of the farthest leftwing wackjob of all leftwing wackjobs. In fact, it is their plan, turned around on them.



You see, their plan is to change things from the inside. That can be our plan also.



Simply put we need a large amount of republicans to register as democrat and change the democratic party from the inside. While we are inside, we will still donate money...to the republicans, and we will use our position to vote for the person that is the least likely democratic candidate to win against the republicans.



If enough republicans go 'undercover' we can, in a relatively short time, turn the democratic party into a shambles, or push them off the road to socialism/communism. Perhaps we can destroy the ACLU also.



This won't be hard to do either. All you have to do, once you go undercover, is to state values completely OPPOSITE of your own. You will fit right in by spouting off crazy ideas about 'the poor', bitch about Bush, complain of "American Imperialism", and say that "the rich" need to be taxed more all while calling for more social programs to help the "downtrodden". They will never suspect you are a mole.



Of course you will have to learn not to point out things that are obvious to people with common sense. Try to remember while you are doing this that you are saving the country, and you are only saying those things as an operative of the Truth and of Patriotism. Swallow your disgust at lying, knowing that the best spies and behind the scenes people MUST LIE to keep their agenda unknown and affect the change they so dearly know is needed. When it is time to vote in a primary vote for the most obvious loser, all the while complaining that the party is going to hell in a handbasket.



If enough right thinking people do this it will work.



So....whaddya think of Plan D.

...Todays episode of "Let's Piss Off The Liberal Left".



Alright let's get started shall we?



Todays show highlights the liberal lefts' agenda to destroy America as we know and love it. Just so none of our brainwashed-closet-communist-liberal-wackjobs out there in the blogosphere don't get confused (we know how easily THAT happens) we are going to define the word "Liberal".

www.hyperdictionary.com defines a liberal as: "a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties"

I believe that most liberals, being the brainwashed automatons that they are belive in their heart of hearts that this definition does indeed describe them.



THEY ARE WRONG!!!! But then we know that don't we?



Now that we have that established I will explain just why todays "liberals" are liberals of a dangerous stripe. These are not the liberals of yesteryear, whose sole intent was to help poor people prosper. The new liberal of today is bent on the destruction of our civil liberties with the end goal of communism in mind.

There are, unfortunately, many people that don't realize this, and happily support the democrats and the ACLU, ignorantly toddling along this most destructive road, all the while believing that they are honest patriots that just want what is best for America.



In an earlier post I posted a list of communist goals for taking over America. Most of these things have been put into action by the democrats, and undereducated Americans who have lost, or in the case of the younger generation never had, their critical thinking skills, never saw it coming. America has stood by long enough watching these bastards destroy our country while leading us down the road to a seriously weakened nation. If this continues for much longer this Great Experiment in Self Governance will fail, and not because it doesn't work, but because We The People got too damn lazy to protect ourselves and forgot the principles this country was founded on in the first place.



I will take these definitions one at a time.



Progress is just what the democrats are accomplishing. Progress towards a nany state that coddles you from the cradle to the grave. Progress towards a socialist or communist country. The difference in what they get is completely up to you. If you stand and fight now, their "progress" can be halted and trends reversed towards our days of greatness. The days when an American could make a better life or not, depending on their drive, ambition and skill. The left, in league with the ACLU, is dragging us down the road that will lead to our demise. Anyone that reads this, or anything else that state these truths are, if they do nothing to fight it, complicit in this plan and should be brought up on charges of treason. That is right. All you "liberals" out there that know what is happening are TRAITORS!!!



Reform. Just what is the left and the ACLU trying to reform? I will tell you. A great country where, once upon a time, and man could take hard work or a good idea, toss in some intelligence and maybe a smidge of luck and be a successful person. They could better their place in society. When that happened his family would have a bigger home and could afford to have those things which denoted wealth, whether it was a housekeeper or a bigger car, or perhaps be able to afford a better college for their kids. The "reform" happening in this country now is completely against all those things that made America great. We are told that the state can raise our children better, instilling in them "Politically Correct Values" of "Tolerance" and "Global Thinking". These are terms that are leading us astray.



Protection of Civil Liberties. Under the guise of protecting our civil liberties the ACLU is trying to force feed us 'Tolerance'. Tolerance is one thing, but blind aquiesence to evil is completely another. Should we tolerate NAMBLA simply because they claim that the things they do are their 'beliefs'? The ACLU, by the way, is counsel for NAMBLA, pro bono at that. Should we tolerate the constant assault on our civil liberties by being told that school children can't sing Silent Night in school because it is a 'religious song'? What ever happened to Freedom of Speech? I guess it doesn't apply if religion is involved. At least if that religion is Christianity. If it is Islam we must 'tolerate' it, or be labeled a bigot and possibly a racist.



Now on to the bonus round.



The ACLU. ACLU founder Roger Baldwin, said ""I have continued directing the unpopular fight for the rights of agitation, as director of the American Civil Liberties Union." Now that may sound innocuous enough. It is the right, indeed the duty of every citizen to question the government, after all it is our government. By the People For the People Of the People...remember that? But Roger Baldwin takes it to a step that, if successful, will have made the cold war a failure. He was nothing short of a communist.

The rest of his quote goes like this "I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."





Do you hear that you brainwashed leftists?????



"Communism is the goal" Do you see where you are leading us by being sheep? Is it any wonder that so many people would vote for Bush knowing what you know now?



I realize that alot of people that vote democrat are not well off, but do you idiots actually think that getting rid of the propertied class is a good thing? Do you not have one ounce of ambition to better yourself and own your own house? Or make enough money to go on a vacation somewhere you always wanted to see?



Or do you want to sit on your ass and let the government take care of you and tell you where to live by assigning you a house and tell you what you can do for a job because that is what they need done? Do you really not see where the current democrat party is leading you? Are you so dense that this sounds good to you?



Communism, under any name is evil...socialism is one degree removed from communism, and is just as evil in its' own way. The long and short of it is if we don't do something to stop the far left and the ACLU we are doomed. Freedom is doomed. Liberty is doomed. If these guys are successful a great nation will perish, beaten from within by laziness on our part and traitorous bastards with law degrees.



Stand up people...stand up and fight before it is too late.



"Liberty is often a heavy burden on a man. It involves the necessity

for perpetual choice which is the kind of labor men have always

dreaded." --Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.

I ran across this story in the paper yesterday. I want to highlight a couple of sentences.



"federal regulations requiring a diverse workforce"



"Companies must show...that they're making "good faith efforts" to work with local organizations..."



"The Labor Department says companies should do outreach with many communities to try to fill openings, and should consider women, minorities, the disabled, people over 40, veterans and people of different national origins, sexual orientations and religions, Browning said.



"Everyone, at some time in their life, is going to be part of a protected class," Browning said."



And that last sentence right there folks is why this country is going down the fuckin' tubes. The liberals want to babysit you from the cradle to the grave. Making sure you are healthy and have a job so you can put your money in their socialist piggy bank, while at the same time making sure that true riches and honest independence never come your way.



The government has made regulations to make sure that you are looking for people of color, women, handicapped and every other group the liberals deem 'minorities' because they don't trust business owners to hire the most qualified person for the job.



The most protected person in this country today must be a middle aged, obese female person of color in a wheelchair with an I.Q. of 65. And I bet some liberal somewhere thinks she deserves a job...probably making 80 grand a year.

Dear readers, one of the commentors on my little blog here is Ryan Ray. I like Ryan. He attempts to counter my posts, mostly about communism, and tries very hard, and I applaud him for that attempt. Sometimes he even has a valid, yet minor, point.

I was going to post a response to a comment he made, and in fact wrote it up in the comment box. But I decided that it needed to be front page stuff. Below is my response to his comment about my posting the french parody song, and my response to that.



Enjoy, and please toss in your own two cents. And American pennies only please.



Key "ryan" >>Kender<<

His words are in "quotemarks", mine are in the >>arrows<<



Ryan, at the bottom of this comment you made elsewhere on this blog are the words "fiery response from me" which is you saying this was a fiery response. This is 'fiery'?



O.K., as S.O.P., I will take this apart bit by bit.





"as for the weaklings that the french are today"



>>Let's begin today with some lessons in capitalization. Can you say that? Good, then do it. I am not asking for perfect grammar, as I don't have perfect grammar due to the fact that I write as I speak, but at least put forth the effort to capitalize, if nothing else, the beginning of sentences. Some punctuation wouldn't hurt either, son. You come off as lazy, (a classic communist trait BTW) and kind of uneducated, which I don't really believe completely, but then the other readers may not know that you are in school still. As for the comment you made about the french today being weaklings it is their choice. They have chosen, along with the rest of Europe, a path of appeasment, which is leading them down the road to ruin. Ruin by the simple act of NOT acting to stop radical islamic factions from forming in their countries, and allowing them to begin putting their, (radical islamists), view upon the countries they are in.<<



"i feel that i have some defending to do from a country with a (not always happy) tradition of french-canadians."



>>There is nothing you can say that will defend the inaction, and complete cowardice, of the french. They have gone right along with the corrupt U.N.s agenda, backing sanctions against Iraq when they were not working, obstensibly to give a peaceful resolution a chance, while reaping huge profits, illegally I may add, and standing in the way of what is right. France wants desperately to matter on the world stage. But they don't, and rightfully so. They have done nothing to earn respect. They give in to terrorists demands simply by showing that they will not stand against them, all in the name of short term profits and at the expense of long term freedom.<<





"i mean if you're going to make fun of them there's ample ammunition for it. they never win or even fight wars and they have a strange inferiority complex that leads to insane nuclear testing."



>>You have valid points there, and I have no argument with that statement except that france pursues a nuclear program in their defense, which is funny in itself since france understands the concept of defense in one way.....Raise Our Arms. As for france having an inferiority complex? That is not strange at all. That just simply shows that in one respect, at least, they are perceptive.<<





"but the song was written awkwardly and oftentimes was too retarded and tasteless. the only thing funny about it is the melody. you can put anything into that melody and make it funny. watch."



>>Yes, the song was somewhat awkward, but it is a PARODY!!! A concept, by the way, which would have meant death in the ussr. I never claimed the song was great, but I said it was funny.<<



"you're a green one,

you're a yank

you lie so you can steal

you're as friendly as a weasel

as helpful as a snake

you f'in waaaanKERS! :D"



>>Obviously you have no grasp of, nor appreciation for, parody. That was a sad attempt, as you didn't stay within the cadence of the original song. Perhaps I will write one about communist canuk kids eh?<<



"see it sounds a lot like shit but it goes on and on. it's just that easy. true that it's a song lyric but it's a valid statement as well. matthew good also sings about falling in love with a bad idea which i can get to in a minute."



>>Parody doesn't have to be well written, simply funny. I stand by my statement that this song is just that.<<



"but about the weaklings that they are today and the statue of liberty. at the time they gave your country the statue of liberty it was commonplace for men to wear today's women's clothes in public. enough said."



>> I would like to know what womens clothes you are speaking about. That is really in invalid point as it has nothing to do with the statue or the french or the song. Really this section made no sense whatsoever.<<



"they gave it because the american revolution gave their people the courage they required to enact their own coup d'etat. it was an applause of the original american indepedence."



>> Ah, if only the french would have stayed on the path they stepped upon during their revolution then perhaps today the would be a stronger country, capable of defending themselves and not making such fools of themselves as they do in the eyes of so much of the free world. In fact, if they had followed our example, instead of following their tiny chickenshit hearts and hiding in holes everytime someone else picked up a gun, maybe the would have stood up to hitler, and America, along with her allies, would not have had to save the world.....twice.<<



"they can recognize good ideas, so they can recognize bad ones too. what they're doing today is warning your country of a bad idea."



>>The only good idea that france ever recongnized was the one that led to them helping us gain our freedom from the English. (Well, and maybe the metric system. I admire the metric system as it is based on math and you can lose all info on it save the way to create the system and go out and perfectly recreate it. That is an awesome idea. But I digress.) Then again, I believe they mostly did that to piss off the English in the first place. And the only warning the french should EVER be able to give is one in Paris saying, "Hide, here come the Germans....again!<<



"it comes off as acerbic, foreign, retarded and pointless, but it's sincerely a friendly message. and that's why you guys are so offended by it."



>>It comes off as acerbic because the french are naturally that way. It comes off as foriegn, in a sense of the word that means one doesn't understand it, because they french concept of bravery does not exist. Cowardice is a concept that is 'foreign' to the American psyche, but ingrained in the french. It comes off as retarded and pointless because french foriegn policy is also retarded and pointless. THE FRENCH ARE ARE FUCKING COWARDS PERIOD!!!! I, along with most Americans, don't consider the current stance of the french as a sincerely friendly message. The only time the french have been sincerely friendly to us , after the statue thing, is when WE are marching in Paris, and not the Germans.<<



"friends are the ones who kick your ass or shoot you down when you need it the most. conversely, they're usually the ones who piss you off the most when they do it."



>>NO!!!!! Friends stand beside you. Wise friends may take you aside and say that you should rethink your course of action if they don't believe in what you are doing, but still they stand WITH YOU. They don't yell out in front of everybody that you are wrong. Friends have your back, meaning they watch it in a fight and help you win, not stab you in it. True friends know how to speak to you when they think you are wrong so you don't get angry, but listen and consider instead.<<



"i heard your country was moved far enough to take your french fries back and make them "freedom fries" a la 1984. friends piss each other off more often than not. so take them for what they are."



>>The word french fries came about after WW1, when the doughboys returned home, and it is actually a Belgian creation. Some people do call them freedom fries, but most people still don't. The country is suffeciently outraged by the french action to notice, but still don't see the point of changing our common usage of a word because of a bunch of cowardly frogs.<<



"i've never been to france but i like them."



>>Good, you like them, please go there and visit. Paris stinks to high heaven in the summer due to the dog shit in the streets. I think france looks like a beautiful country, from what I have seen. Too bad it is filled with a bunch of backwards thinking assholes.<<



"they have the best football team in the world and pires/viera/zidane/trezeguet/henry are unstoppable when on their game. if you saw them in 1998 on the TV, you saw their whole country at its best."



>>O.K., let me set something straight. When you talk to an American, the word football means the game we play here called by that name. The game you call football we call soccer. If you talk to an American about soccer call it soccer. We don't care what the rest of the world calls it, much like we don't care that the rest of the world is metric.<<





"at its worst, i've heard that they were assholes on the ivory coast lately and have a long history of being assholes in africa. they were the target example in "the wretched of the earth" by franz fanon. as for what your blog says regarding french atrocities, it's lying. i've seen the video."



>>I have not read that book, but perhaps old Franzy had something there. As for being assholes in the Ivory Coast, if you have seen the video, how can you say it is lying? The french soldiers there are shooting unarmed demonstrators. And the world press sayss not one word? But we shoot one fucking insurgent, after they (insurgents) have been boobytrapping bodies, pretending to play dead and then setting off explosives, or acting as if they are surrendering and then ambushing us, and we are the bad guys? What mitigating circumstances led the french murderers to shoot unarmed demonstrators? Perhaps they were hurling insults at the french? BTW, unarmed people are the only people that the french like to shoot at, as that is the only group that can't fight back.<<



"your quote went that the american soldier was shooting an injured threat to his life. there was no threat to his life. the man was down and out and unarmed."



>> See above for comments on this quote.<<



"a country that appoints itself as above the geneva convention should try leading by example if they don't want to piss the world off, which escalates and makes otherwise normal people start talking about terrorist activities in the united states mainland as an actually viable alternative."



>>The Americans are bound to the GC only as far as signatories to that paper are concerned. The terrorists and insurgents have been acting far outside its' bounds, yet want us to follow its rules. That is BS, yet we have been following the GC, except for minor instances, and those do get investigated, and sometimes, if the evidence is strong enough, prosecuted.<<



"my point is, that soldier was a pussy."



>>I won't even go there with you. The idea of you fighting for anything other than a place at the bar is absurd to me, and until you have been in his position you have no right to judge. I probably would have done the same thing.<<



"in everyone's experience, it's easier to fight than not to fight. your first instinct is to punch someone in the head when shit goes down. even when someone starts talking about sense that you have no idea about, you tune them out and want to punch them in the head. if someone really pisses you off, you want to drop a bomb or fire any weapon. it's an animal instinct. we're still very animal here."



>>No, when someone starts talking "'sense' that you have no idea about" you don't tune them out. You show them the error of their thinking, like I attempt with you. THEN you whack them in the head. And in the animal kingdom, since you brought it up, who rules? Yeah, the biggest meanest fuckin' animal in the group.<<





"not fighting is what's much harder to do. it's what the mentally tough are able to provide as an option. the physically tough component has nothing to do about it. it's nothing to do with penis size or loneliness either. it's about knowledge, future sense and the sincere desire for a decrease of pain in the world."



>>Fighting, when it is called for, takes a strength far beyond the weakness needed to be a coward. The mentally tough, us BTW, have provided it as an option, and exercised that option when the rest of the world was too fearful or lazy or corrupt to act. America does have a desire to decrease the suffering in the world, starting, like charity, at home. And before you start on all our homeless, which BTW we have fewer of than most countries, ours, unlike most countries, rarely die of startvation. And you brought up the penis size thing.....freudian slip perhaps?<<



"as an aside, you must have noticed that the election results in your country most always represented the line between slave states and non-slave states. they have comparisons of maps out there. i'm just saying that maybe your civil war didn't intend what it wanted to, or maybe your country has a sincere inferiority problem like a collective slave mentality, such as what was said about nazi-era germans. maybe it's a problem that they need to talk about, i don't know."



>>You certainly don't know. Many states that voted 'red' to use our figure of speech, did not exist during that time. Same goes for kerry, and the 'blue' states. The civil war was not only to stop slavery but to hold together a union that would, in the long run, make us the most properous and free country that this planet has ever seen. You have said elsewhere that the french have an inferiority complex. Now you claim that of us. If we did we would probably see eye to eye with the french. We don't. We don't have a superiority complex either. We have a faith in the beliefs that this country was founded on. We have faith that our founding documents are as true today as they were 228 years ago, and we believe they will be as true and relevant 228 years from now.<<



"my long-winded point was that i'll be watching like a hawk and if i hear anything else that's negative about the french in general (without provocation from current or historical news) you can expect another defensive and fiery response from me."



>>O.K. hawkboy, you have read this post, and I have been nothing if not derisive about the french. I have in fact called them "cowards"! I said they have "tiny chickenshit hearts"! I said they "hide in holes", like so many islamic terrorists BTW! I have intimated they are back-stabbers! I have called them fools! I called them "cowardly frogs"! I called them "backwards thinking assholes"! I have agreed with you that the french are "weaklings", "losers", "acerbic", and not in a funny way, and also "foreign", "retarded" and "pointless".<<



"without provocation from current or historical news i say."



>>Since you left yourself that particular out I will say that everyting I have said about the french stands. Fuck the french. They are the biggest group of proud cowards this world has ever known.<<



"that still leaves it open. yeah it's open still. of course it's open."



>>It is open. Bring it on son. You need an education commie boy!<<



"but like i proved you can make fun of any nationality using that famous melody because the scale is so loaded. even american nationality."



>>Yes you can. That is what is so great about parody."<<



"peace."



>>Perhaps when radical islam is dead. Your turn Ryan.<<

A parody song from Rusty Humphries to teh tune of "You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch" called "You're the french".



You're the weak ones

You're the french

You've made some shaaady deals

You're as cuddly as a Baathist

You're as charming as an eel

You're the free-eench



You're as yellow as a banana



Surrender and squeeeaaallll



You're a traitor

You're the french

We've saved you from

Two waaaars



You're brain is made of brie cheese

Jacque Chirac we like no more

You're the free-eench



I wouldn't trust you



You've done this befooooooree



You're the vile ones

You're the french

You have grape stains on your smiles

You have all the allied secrets

And you gave saddam the files

You're the freee-eench



Given the choice between the two of you



I'd have taken Jong Il

**This is a long post, but worth the read I believe.**



In America today is an insidious movement underfoot to make us a much weaker nation. Created by communists, and outlined in a book called "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen, is a list of 45 goals to take over America. It is 41 years since this list was read into the Congressional Record, and looking back at those 45 years it terrifies me to see how many of these goals have been achieved.



These goals have been enacted by the democrats. The democrats have become an anti-American party. The ACLU their quiet cohorts. A right thinking person would see this list and demand that those in charge of the democratic party, and those running the ACLU, and in fact the monied interests behind the aclu, be brought up on charges of treason. That is correct. Treason.



We are barreling down the road to socialist annihilation, led by the left, and fed by apathy, and undereducated citizens that have been fed these leftist ideals and not taught to think critically.



Below is the list, with my comments concerning successes and dead points, (dead by history making them moot), and what that means now. I am sure I have missed some, and feel free to point those out. Also, feel free to counter these points and try to tell me how this list being implemented over the last 41 years has made this a better country. One last note to those of you that think this is a good thing. Communism is a dead-end street, and the most oppressive countries in history have been those that have adopted it.





THE LIST



1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

(remove the word atomic, and we have one of the great talking points of the liberals in this country, i.e. "No War". Remember the talk of "unilateral disarmament" during the 80s?)



2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

( Yet again another cry of the left, "No War No Matter What! Remember British Prime Minister Chamberlain, (late 30s) before WW2, before they kicked him out? They kicked him out right after he returned with a "paper" that assured peace with Hitler.)



3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

(This one is already being bandied about in U.N. circles I am sure, and in fact has been accomplished in other 'free' countries, at least where the citizens are concerned, and those would be England and Austrailia.)



4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

( This one was enacted in the western hemisphere with NAFTA, under Clinton, a dem., of course, and has been furthered by the trade policies with china.)



5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

( this is an area I know little about....at the moment, but shows that even in 1963 the soviets needed our help.)



6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

( This one really irks me. We send money to alot of pits around the world, and get nothing back, not even the good will of their people, i.e. egypt, and it is a practice we should stop.)



7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

(Done, and done.)



8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

(this one no longer applies with the fall of the soviet empire, but the U.N. monitoring elections anymore is like having a fox watch the henhouse.)



9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

(Atomic testing goes on around the world, with many countries achieving nuclear capabilities. A scary thought really. Just one insane man with a button to push and nothing to lose could bring hell to earth in an instance.)



10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

(Alot of these 'soviet satellites have indeed joined the U.N., but they are no longer communist, and some are even heavily muslim.)



11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. [Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.]

(this is my comment, a one world government is an idea whose time, should it come, would destroy America. This idea would causmore death and destruction than WW1 and WW2 combined, as it would turn into the U.S. citizenry against anyone that cared to step up and enforce it. Unless they succeed in disarming the populace here.)





12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

(outlawing the communist party has not been done, but a quick perusal of their site shows it may be time to bite the bullet and do just that, since most of them vote democrat anyway.)



13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

(Communists hate loyalty oaths, unless it is to them. I wonder, if this all comes to pass, would soldiers in the U.N. armed forces be forced to take an oath to obey the U.N.A.F., even if it was to shoot there countrymen and neighbors? Oh wait, there would be no loyalty to any country at that point would there?)



14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

( I am still trying to figure this one out.)



15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

(Oh boy they have...the democrats. If you don't believe it just pop on over to the CPUSA site or and the Dems site and see how many points they match on.)



16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

(Wow has this one gone on and succeeded big time. Think Boy Scouts, Christmas displays and a whole host of others.)



17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

( This one is succeeding as well. They left has tried to outlaw homeschooling, and may make inroads into it sooner than later. They are attacking private education, unless it is at the college level, where they have a virtual monopoly on leftwing ideology. They have softened the curriculum, note the sorry state of test scores and the sad lack of knowledge public school students have, no matter how much money gets tossed at it. The teachers unions are the students worst enemy.)



18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

(They are doing this, especially on college and university campuses. Even teh mainstream press, (another leftist bastion) noted the support for the left before the last election, and in fact the kerry camp was counting on first time votes from college kids that, luckily, never materialized.)



19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

( Again, Boy Scouts, World Economic conferences and the list goes on. Who do you think wacausing all teh riots a couple of years back in seattle and NYC?)



20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

(One word here...Done...example, NY Times, LA Times, and most other major newspapers you care to mention. It isn't complete though. Even the NY tImes couldn't keep Michael Savage off the best seller list.)



21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

(This has been done, and usually I don't agree with censorship, but the FCC is correct to take back the airwaves and try to stall the fall of this country.)



22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

(Wow, some of what passes for "art" really fits teh "shapeless, awkward and meaningless" description doesn't it? And the liberals fawn over it and say how "avant-garde" it is. I am beginning to suspect that "avant-garde" is french for fuckin ugly.)



23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

( O.K., see last comment by me.)



24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

(If the left is not up in arms about the FCC and calling it censorship then I am a blue monkey. This one has been an ongoing campaign since the 60's)



25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

(Witness this one at work. Twelve year old girls dressing as they do these days. Young kids with absolutely no respect for anything and using foul language all the time. the lack of any morals that alot of children grow up with. I have seen this first hand, in the "rainbow parties" my little brothers would tell me about before they graduated high school last year. The girls at these parties would brag to me about them.

)

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

(What you do in the privacy of your house, as an adult, is fine, but when the schools start teaching homosexuality courses (obstensibly under the guise of tolerance) to first graders things have gone too far.)



27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

( Wow, "religious crutch"...a left wing term if I ever heard one. This one is still ongoing, and the fight is far from over.)



28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

(This one, unfortunately, is succeeding. The ACLU is the most un-American group that has ever fouled our country, and the money behind it should be brought to task for their treason.)



29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

( This one is starting to take hold, but only in the liberal camp. The constitution is a timeless document whose truths could, if the left can be defeated, lead teh world to a better place.)



30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

(The American Founding Fathers were anything but aristocrats. Common men who rose up through an onerous british tax system, finally throwing off that yoke once it got too heavy, and creating a country of free men. This one is not quite working too well yet, although if the schools aren't reined in it will take hold better.)



31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

(This one is not completely enacted, although it is getting there with the advent of 'world history' having more emphasis in the schools, and American history has been under attack from the left and the aclu, trying to downplay the importance of our countries founding and throwing focus onto the parts of our history that we are rightfully ashamed of, i.e. slavery.)



32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

( This one is in full swing. The government runs all of these things, and not well I may add.)



33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

( Slowly but surely this one is gaining ground. Think aclu, a group that claims to be pro constitution, but is anti American.)



34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

(Done.)



35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

(They have been working on this for awhile. Doesn't seem to be working yet.)



36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

(This is one seems to be working. Unions are actually driving business out of the country, with wage demands that make it more profitable for business to move elsewhere.)



37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

( This one I am up in the air about. Perhaps by proxy this one is working. With unions driving business out of the country perhaps the communists dont actually have to be in control of the companies to drive us down their dark road.)



38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

( This has been done quite effectively. With criminals being labeled 'troubled' and in need of "therapy", I would have to sya this one is a big fucking success.)



39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

( In other words, if you oppose them you will be labeled nuts and tossed in a loonybin and medicated beyond all thinking. Nice.)



40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

( Wow, another success. This is a leftist tactic, the charge being led by schools and pop culture, and propped up in the courts. It is now legal in California for your kid to leave the school campus and go get medical attention, (birth control, abortion, treatment for VD) without the parents being notified. In other words, you have no right, as a parent, to know when your kid may be in trouble.)



41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

( Yet another success. How can parents be a negative influence? Good parents, the majority of them by the way, want their children safe and what is best for their children. Most every parent I have ever known, including me, would die, literally, before letting their child suffer.)



42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

(This one is succeeding to a point, and violence was necessary at one time against the 'government', when that government was british, and it may be again if these goals all succeed.)



43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

( They may have this one, I don't know at the moment. They are certainly trying this in Iraq. Perhaps the 'insurgents' have read this list also?)



44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

(I believe that Panama runs the canal now.)



45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

( My comment? This has been an ongoing battle ever since the U.N. charter was ratified in 1945. If we ever lose the Connally Reservation we are screwed beyond belief and it will be a short time between that and the U.N. rtying to tell us what to do. It will be an even shorter time between teh U.N. trying to tell us what to do, or not to do, and us (the CITIZENS OF THE U.S., you know, the Free fellows with all the personal guns?) telling the U.N. to fuck off. Unless the U.N. and teh left dos manage to take our guns...then we are screwed.)



Here is another link, explaining the history, in short form, of the Connally Reservation.



http://www.newswithviews.com/Burns/albert1.htm

"The proposals were welcomed by the majority of Britain's religious communities -- particularly its 1.8 million Muslims who say they have been subjected to a surge in abuse since the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq."





Really? You think? British people don't want to be a muslim country any more than the U.S. or most of Europe, but the path of appeasment Europe has been following for 30 years is certainly putting them at the risk of that.



Simply by the fact that muslims are getting bigger populations in European countries, and gaining citizenship, and voting, and having a say in the way the country runs, they are a threat if radical factions gain power. This is how they do that. Slowly. First they will stop satire of themselves. At least this time they are using a law to do that, and not a gun and two knives. If artistic freedom is quashed, then freedom of speech is not far behind.



Unfortunately, the only path I see, as cruel as it sounds, is to be blatently racist for awhile. Bar the immmigration of Arabs and monitor mosques and muslim people. Let's face it here people. Radical Islam is a serious threat to the peace of the world and the freedom of the 'west', and since moderate muslims will not help us police the radicals in their ranks then we simply must take a hardline stance and send them packing until such time as they (moderate muslims) see fit to side with peace and freedom.



Once they do that we can welcome them with open arms. But I fear that the radicals would only go underground and play moderate until they were allowed back in and then start this all over again. But I am willing to follow that course. If we did toss 'em all and let them return once the moderates were onboard, and the violence started up again, then we would be forced to ban them forever or, in an extreme case, actually destroy islam. That would be a sad day for them. But the nazis had to be taken down too, and I am sure it was a sad day for the nazis when we did that.



Now don't get me wrong, I am not equating radical...wait, I am equating radical islam with the nazi regime. I am and much like the nazis, they must be destroyed.



If you stand with them you deserve what you get.

More bullshit!

Arizona voters, you know those people that live here legally (hopefully) and DO have a say in what happens here, voted, by an overwhelming majority, for Prop. 200, an anti-illegal immigrant law that will essentially deny ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS access to STATE benefits. Federal benefits would still be covered. It also requires state workers to verify legal status of those applying for benefits and report to INS those that are here illegally.



Couching their language in PC speak by calling these federal lawbreakers "undocumented immigrants", MALDEF, the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, filed a lawsuit against the state of Arizona.



The judge said, among other things: "It seems likely that if Proposition 200 were to become law, it would have a dramatic, chilling effect upon undocumented aliens who would otherwise be eligible for public benefits under federal law,"



I want them to have a chilling effect. I want them to be so chilled that they head south so they can warm up while they are waiting for a work visa...you know, the legal way to come here?



What kind of BS is this? This is an American judge, who is sworn to uphold the law. The law states that illegally coming here is a crime, and a federal one at that. If I break a federal law you can bet that the government is going to put me, and American citizen, in FEDERAL PRISON!!!!



"... MALDEF, claimed Proposition 200 turns state employees into immigration agents, denies benefits covered by federal law and could discourage thousands of Arizonans from voting."



VOTING??? What Arizonans would be discouraged from voting? The illegal ones? What the hell are they doing voting in the first place?



So it would turn state employees into immigration agents? If a state employee thought I was committing fraud by getting benefits when I am not entitled to them then they would call the police and have me arrested right? So why is it that illegal immigrants are getting special treatment for breaking a federal law?



"Attorneys sued on behalf of more than a dozen plaintiffs, including undocumented immigrants, their children, and state employees from the Valley and Tucson."



State employees? So if they won't report people that are here illegally would they report me if I went to Arizona and got benefits like welfare to live on while actually still living in California? I just may have to try that. As for suing on behalf of "undocumented immigrants" that shouldn't be here in the first place? Great strategy.



I think I will go to another country and have one of their lawyers sue their government on my behalf to get benefits that I shouldn't be getting in the first place. I think I will try mexico first.

This is just the very beginning of the downfall, and hopefully eventual ouster, of the U.N. The U.N. has outlived it's usefulness. It is full of corrupt people who have the worst of intentions towards the U.S....



Wow...I was just doing research in the middle of this post and have found some things I had heard about and been meaning to get to browse.



What I have found is, to say the least, distressing....and to put it in words that are screaming in my head, FUCKING ASININE!!!!!



O.K., here is the deal. The U.N., and it seems, quite a few countries, are really chasing this "globalization" thing. They have a plan for an international criminal court, and on their "rogues gallery" is, among others, Kissinger and Ariel Sharon. Frankly I don't like the idea of an international criminal court that would essentially take away the rights of Americans to be tried by their courts under their laws.



Here is a phrase you are going to hear more of in teh coming years. Universal jurisdiction. I am going to do alot more research on this stuff.



To finish up this post I will say that the U.S. needs to get the hell out of the U.N.



The U.N. will be the downfall of freedom as we know it. More to come.

and fuck the UN

Click on the title...The page it takes you to is another blog...Click the link for the video clip...It is a 20 minute video of french soldiers firing into a crowd of unarmed people...Not a video of an American Soldier shooting an injured threat to his life...But french soldiers in the Cote D' Ivoire shooting UNARMED and PEACEFUL people...Where is the media now?



Spread this around..get out the word....unless you are so one sided that only America deserves bad press and that the truth doesn't need to be out there if it doesn't make America look bad.

It seems to me that I have been hearing alot more about Americans moving to canada after the election. This is a good thing I think.



If you are one of those Americans that swore they would move out of the country if Bush won, and you don't want to use "Kenders Kiss My Ass and Get Out of My Country Travel Agency" (click title about travel arrangements), then by all means move to canada.



Really, go. We don't want any whiny wuss ass crybabies that run at the first sign of failure. That isn't an AMERICAN ATTITUDE. A true American would stay and fight for what they believe in, not cut and run while drying their tears and sobbing about the unfairness of the world.



And while I am on the subject perhaps the government would see fit to strip people that move to canada for political reasons of their U.S. citizenship.



Oh, and if you do go, for Americas sake please take striesand with you!

I wish I could say I don't believe this story, but since I live in the Socailist Republic of Caulifourneea I can believe it.



All I have to say to the asswipes enforcing this bundle of shittiness is "You guys SUCK!!!! Why should we have to suffer because you were deprived as children?"



Of course, that they were deprived is my opinion...I don't know that for a fact..but how else can you explain their over-zealous actions?

Asswipes!!!

To the Dutch I say, Welcome to the new world order. A world where common sense and national priorites should triumph. In a country where democracy reigns, i.e. where the majority of voters decide where the country is headed and what laws to enact in that country, in other words its' culture, radical islam can be a dangerous thing. Witness Theo van Gogh. The Dutch have it correct. Stop the immigration of non-western people and deport the ones that are causing trouble.



I know to some that may sound racist, however, the vast majority of radical islamic thinking does not come from the "west", it comes from the "east". Moderate islam can be a peaceful religion with its' adherents joining together with 'westerners' to create a prosperous and thriving society. Before we welcome moderates though I must caution you that the moderates will not help weed out the radical factions, and until they do they must be sent packing also. Once they do help identify the radicals and try to make the world a better and safer place for freedom then I think teh moderates should be welcomed in with open arms.



But radical islam needs to be wiped out.

This just in....french citizens have been killed alongside insurgents in Iraq, fighting against the Americans. Now I know what you may say. I can hear you after you read the article. "But, these guys were arabs, not actual frenchmen." SHUT UP!!!! You can't have it both ways. If they were arabs they should have stayed at home, not gotten french citizenship and then decide to go fight with their 'brothers' in arms.



To those of you that have questioned things I have written, mostly about Europe being slowly taken over by radical muslim factions, what say you now? These guys were radical muslims. If they weren't, they would have stayed in france.



BTW, if you aren't too busy wondering how to counter these TRUTHS with a liberal spin, go ahead and take a few moments and google food for oil...and you will see just how corrupt the french are.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4023021.stm



Go ahead, read that link.

I simply cannot believe this!







While talking to a friend of mine the other day about the state of affairs in the world in general, and the war in Iraq in particular, I was astounded to learn how much she simply didn't know about what is going on in the world.



First some background. This friend is someone I admire....alot. She is intelligent, talented, ambitious, dedicated to her vision, and receiving her masters degree in her chosen field from a prestigious university. She completely rocks and I am proud to call her friend.



However, being in college she has the luxury of a very liberal view of the world. I say luxury because I believe it is a luxury to be able to sit back with a liberal world view and TSK TSK at the war and Americas policies in general. Once most people get to the real world their eyes open up and reality hits them, and most people realize how the world works and drift away from a hardline liberal view. I believe it was Churchill that said, "Everyone is a liberal at 20, and a conserative at 40." I may have paraphrased that but the point remains.



Speaking of that, back on point. My friend backed Kerry, and despises Bush, and doesn't understand why we are at war, or what the consequences would be if we pulled out now. She was completely unaware of so much history...of the fact that a country called Palestine has never existed...of the fact that islamic factions are slowly taking over Europe...of the murder of Theo Van Gogh and the causes that led to it and the backlash that has arisen from it...nor was she aware of the corrupt food-for-oil program and the fact that france, Germany and Russia were all in on that and opposed us at every turn because of financial concerns.



Her only argument was "I don't think it's right that we are killing innocent people in Iraq." I don't like that fact either. Perhaps we are creating 2 more terrorists for each one we kill. Eventually though the word will get out that the propaganda the islamic schools feed their children is false. Propaganda such as the jews caused 9-11 and all the jewish people were gone from the building when the planes hit. Propaganda that the U.S. is on a holy crusade with the goal of wiping out muslims.



It scares me to think that alot of these kids in college that were, (are) so rabidly anti-Bush could know so little about why America is following the course laid out now, by history and current events, and why we must stay that course, not only for the betterment of America, but the betterment of the world.



On the other hand, I sure am glad that the huge turnout of college kids swearing to vote for kerry never materialized.



So my hearty thanks to all those college kids that were going to "Rock The Vote"....thanks for sleeping in and not voting. Your blessed laziness may save us yet.

Yep...this is me

You Are a "Don't Tread On Me" Libertarian

You distrust the government, are fiercely independent, and don't belong in either party. Religion and politics should never mix, in your opinion... and you feel opressed by both. You don't want the government to cramp your self made style. Or anyone else's for that matter. You're proud to say that you're pro-choice on absolutely everything!

Do you know what the definition of 'dhimmitude' is? No? Read on, but you will have to follow the links to learn.

I have two blogs now. This one you are reading and this other one here:

http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=Kendersmusings



In a comment to a post of mine, an extreme post, or so the commentor thought, I was accused of the same hatred that the islamic extremists harbor. Quite the contrary. I don't harbor that hatred. In that post I was simply going to the logical conclusion of the liberals apparent wish that the U.S. pull out of Iraq. I never stated that I was simply following along to the liberals logical conclusion, nevertheless, that is where I ended up.

So I wish to take this time to clarify myself.

In continuing to read this post, and follow along with my thinking here, you, dear reader, are going to have to take some responsibility and click a couple of links and read.

If you don't READ the pages that the links take you to, don't bother posting a comment that you think has the slightest chance of swaying me in my stance. If you do follow the links and read the pages, and you still have a comment that doesn't agree with my line of reasoning, THEN, and only then, may you feel free to post a comment. I truly believe that if you read these pages that you will come away believing what I have to say. If you don't, I will probably lament either A) your public school education or B) your utter lack of reading comprehension.. To begin here are your links.



http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=couchgrouchRead the Sept. 18th post titled Eurabia Jihad Watch......then read:



http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15877...when you finish with that read the next link, but I warn you it is a bit longer:



http://www.aei.org/news/newsID.19912,filter./news_detail.asp



Now, if you have read all of these links, feel free to post a comment regarding the following comments.

I don't like war, but sometimes it is necessary.......I believe that the liberals, and anyone that disagrees with the fact that we are in Iraq is a fool.....I don't care what the rest of the world thinks of us, as they don't have our best interests at heart.....I think if we have to march the world over to eradicate radical islamic terrorists then that is what we should do...I believe in spreading the ideas of Freedom and Democracy.....yes, even through the use of force, for if Freedom and Democracy were able to thrive where we need apply force then, in a vicious circle, we wouldn't have to apply the force...see the thinking here?....I know some of you may say I am engaging in circular thinking, and I don't care...the bottom line is radical islamic regimes, and the terrorist they spawn, (and believe me, it is NOT us that spawn them), need to be destroyed...not negotiated with....not bargained with...not placated....but destroyed.....no treaties.....no quarter....no mercy....we are dealing with an enemy that uses fear, and the most evil of tactics, and they will give no quarter nor show mercy...it is their way or death...don't believe me?...read the koran.....I know they say it is a religion of peace, and it can be....but these guys have taken it to an extreme that, if they had the power, would have made hitler and the holocaust look like a day in the park......imagine for one moment a world where extreme islamic rule is the law.....and if you think for one minute that they are not going to try that think again....you may not see that in your lifetime....but the day will come...people in the U.S. in the late 30's believed hitler wasn't a threat to the world......he was, and we stopped him...just like we will stop these extremists now....tolerance is not working in Europe....and in another 10 years when other countries are experiencing what the Dutch are going through now they will realize the folly of their current path.....so to all you 'tolerant' liberals out there that are afraid to offend someone if you speak out for what you believe in I say you need to believe in something besides tolerance....it isn't working for europe, and it wouldn't work here....just remember when it all comes to a head and you wake up and say we need to stop these guys before we lose our Freedom that is wasn't you that saw it comeing....but us that saved your ass.

...go here.....http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=Kendersmusings

A part of me wants our troops to come home from Iraq, victorious and with a Democracy blooming where once sat a salted plot of land, incapable of growing nothing but bitterness.



Another part of me wants our troops to come home RIGHT NOW and toss out every last foreign national in the States, (if you weren't born here leave), close the borders to them and tell those that are whining so much about "the evil Americans" to solve their own problems, and leave us and our friends alone. I know that sounds like a petulant 10 year old, saying if you don't like it stay out of my yard, but sometimes kids have the right idea.

No longer will I have to post comments anonymous. To all you out there that haven't gone public yet still post comments shame on you. What are ya', chicken?