Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
8:12 PM | 
Posted by
kender
I thought with the riots in Francistan that "aren't" occurring right now that it would be timely to repost this little gem. When I first wrote this people said "It'll never happen"......guess what?
It has started!!!
The elections in France have led to a surprise, and a radical imam of the Paris Mosque has been elected President of France. Within weeks the France the world knew for so long is gone, destroyed by a dark vision of the future justified by "the will of the people and Allah the Merciful".
The Islamic Caliphate of Francistan is newly established, and the purges of artists, free-thinkers, public arts and anyone non-muslim is in full swing.
The Louvre has been looted and her collected works destroyed after the newly elected President of Francistan issued orders that all graven images are forbidden. Every museum in France falls before the "Moral Police" and their "Enforcement Squads". Anyone caught trying to smuggle art out of the country is summarily beheaded.
Decrees go out across the land that Burkahs are now mandatory, men cannot shave, and the borders are closed as a precaution. Dhimmitude is the order of the day.
Any that are not devout muslim find them selves being fired from jobs and land taken from them. They are forced into camps and told that they would be found housing as soon as possible, but the squalid camps deteriorate quickly with the coming of winter, and the Red Cross and Red Crescent are denied passage to check the status of those in the camps.
Europe cowers in the shadow of a radical islamic caliphate that is now in possession of nuclear weapons, as the UN attempts to negotiate with the new leaders of Francistan. The UN's power in the world waned tremendously after President Jeb Bush followed the advice of his Secretary of State John Bolton and withdrew from the corrupt organization and threw them out of the country.
From their new offices in The Hague they still attempted to sway world events, but any clout they had was lost when Moammar Khadaffi was made Secretary General. Ever since they were seen as a nuisance with no real authority and were ignored more often than not.
The government of the US watched carefully the developments in Francistan, and indeed was finalizing plans at that very moment to destroy all of Francistans nuclear capabilities at the first sign of trouble with a secret space based weapon that was in a geo-synchronous orbit over Europe. (In actuality they had 6 of them).
It was at precisely that moment that a delegation walked up to the White House gate and asked to see the President.
It was the government in exile of old france that had been ordered put to death for daring to speak against islam and demand a return to the tenet's that had made france a great country once.
They were asking to see the President.
A secret service agent walked into the room and whispered into the Presidents ear. Grimly the President stared at the floor and nodded, mumbling "I see".
Straightening up he looked the secret service agent dead in the eye and said, "In honor of the many years of friendship that Old France showed the United States, and in the same spirit of that friendship, I won't be meeting with the delegation from the Old French Government, and send my condolences about the current situation their with the radical muslims. Be sure to express my shock that a group as peaceful as Jihadists would even dream of destroying cultural works of art and beheading people for simply wanting to be different than the muslims would, and ummm, Joe?"
The secret service agent looked up with a sparkle knowing what was coming....."Send them out some cake" said the President.
"Of course President Bolton." Came the Reply.
XPOSTED@The Wide Awakes, Cao's, MadTech's and Conservative Angst
It has started!!!
The elections in France have led to a surprise, and a radical imam of the Paris Mosque has been elected President of France. Within weeks the France the world knew for so long is gone, destroyed by a dark vision of the future justified by "the will of the people and Allah the Merciful".
The Islamic Caliphate of Francistan is newly established, and the purges of artists, free-thinkers, public arts and anyone non-muslim is in full swing.
The Louvre has been looted and her collected works destroyed after the newly elected President of Francistan issued orders that all graven images are forbidden. Every museum in France falls before the "Moral Police" and their "Enforcement Squads". Anyone caught trying to smuggle art out of the country is summarily beheaded.
Decrees go out across the land that Burkahs are now mandatory, men cannot shave, and the borders are closed as a precaution. Dhimmitude is the order of the day.
Any that are not devout muslim find them selves being fired from jobs and land taken from them. They are forced into camps and told that they would be found housing as soon as possible, but the squalid camps deteriorate quickly with the coming of winter, and the Red Cross and Red Crescent are denied passage to check the status of those in the camps.
Europe cowers in the shadow of a radical islamic caliphate that is now in possession of nuclear weapons, as the UN attempts to negotiate with the new leaders of Francistan. The UN's power in the world waned tremendously after President Jeb Bush followed the advice of his Secretary of State John Bolton and withdrew from the corrupt organization and threw them out of the country.
From their new offices in The Hague they still attempted to sway world events, but any clout they had was lost when Moammar Khadaffi was made Secretary General. Ever since they were seen as a nuisance with no real authority and were ignored more often than not.
The government of the US watched carefully the developments in Francistan, and indeed was finalizing plans at that very moment to destroy all of Francistans nuclear capabilities at the first sign of trouble with a secret space based weapon that was in a geo-synchronous orbit over Europe. (In actuality they had 6 of them).
It was at precisely that moment that a delegation walked up to the White House gate and asked to see the President.
It was the government in exile of old france that had been ordered put to death for daring to speak against islam and demand a return to the tenet's that had made france a great country once.
They were asking to see the President.
A secret service agent walked into the room and whispered into the Presidents ear. Grimly the President stared at the floor and nodded, mumbling "I see".
Straightening up he looked the secret service agent dead in the eye and said, "In honor of the many years of friendship that Old France showed the United States, and in the same spirit of that friendship, I won't be meeting with the delegation from the Old French Government, and send my condolences about the current situation their with the radical muslims. Be sure to express my shock that a group as peaceful as Jihadists would even dream of destroying cultural works of art and beheading people for simply wanting to be different than the muslims would, and ummm, Joe?"
The secret service agent looked up with a sparkle knowing what was coming....."Send them out some cake" said the President.
"Of course President Bolton." Came the Reply.
XPOSTED@The Wide Awakes, Cao's, MadTech's and Conservative Angst
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
34 comments:
Ooooooo! I have goosebumps.
Is insulting France all you are capable of doing? If I may mix some metaphors, you are beating a dead one-trick pony.
Get a freaking clue Leo. If France does not stand up against its Muslim invaders and start having some babies that is exactly the future they face. How is making a prediction about their fate an insult? Take your wanna be film critic ass back where it came from and when you have done some research and can form a coherent statement that contributes to the conversation then you can come out the corner and take the dunce’s cap off. Good stuff as always Kender.
Muslim invaders? Please, the year is not 1095. Anyway, to suggest that in 13 years Muslims will have taken complete control of France is a rather insulting prediction, not to mention one that has about a 10^-32 percent chance of coming true.
Do some research? What for? It's not like you or KKKender has done any research. I am contributing to the coversation (coherently too, or else you would not be able to understand what I am saying) by pointing out how monotonous and racist KKKender is.
And I would appreciate it if your lame insults ("wanna be film critic", "dunce's cap"--ooo, I'm so insulted!) and profanity ("ass"--how eloquent!) were left out of the conversation.
"Is insulting France all you are capable of doing? If I may mix some metaphors, you are beating a dead one-trick pony."
No hold on a minute. We Brits have been insulting the French for six hundred years, so we take it somewhat personally when anyone complains about this fine tradition. Anyway, as pastimes go, frog-bashing is anything but dull: no matter how many different ways we come up with to sneer at them, the French just keep coming back at us with new and ever-more amusing reasons to continue doing so. Right now, as Kender points out, they're poised to become the first nation in history to offer an open invitation to their invaders. Now that's funny.
What invitation? And to what invaders? You would think that if some Muslims wanted to invade France, and France was just inviting them in, it would be mentioned at Drudge or CNN. But apparently not. Looks like KKKender, with his wild "predictions" is more reliable than any news source I can think of.
Also, just because you have been carrying on a racist tradition for 600 years does not mean you should continue. Please, no appeals to tradition. It gets ever so tiresome.
leo, simply because you lack the thought processes to understand the current situation in france, and indeed, the rest of europe to a lesser extent, does not mean that I am wrong.
There are far more people that see the truth of what I am saying than possess the lack of foresight you seem so gifted with....or rather, there are fewer people that lack foresight to your extent trolling my blog.
Taken from:this IQ table
IQ Classifications No Longer in Use
140 and over Genius or near genius
120-140 Very superior intelligence
110-120 Superior intelligence
90-110 Normal or average intelligence
80-90 Dullness
70-80 Borderline deficiency
Below 70 Definite feeble-mindedness
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mental deficiency used to be divided into the following sub-classifications, but these labels began to be abused by the public and are now largely obsolete: Borderline Deficiency (IQ 70-80), Moron (IQ 50-69), Imbecile (IQ 20-49 and Idiot (below 20). Mental deficiency is now generally called mental retardation.
You will note leo that as of yet we have not truly "insulted" you, and if you consider the few phrases bandied about here as insults then perhaps you should leave before we do decide to insult you, idiot.
Ooops, now I did it.
Unfortunately, Leonard Cobet--or Cadet or whatever your name is, darling Kender isn't the only wee fellow to forecast the demise of France and Europe generally as bowing down to muslim extremism in dhimmitude and becoming Eunichstan.
There are more than one billion Muslims in the world. The largest Muslim population, totaling 180 million, is in Indonesia. It is followed by 125 million in Pakistan, Bangladesh with 109 million and India with 84 million. The remainder is spread through 100 countries, including an estimated 5 million Muslims in France.
Though the figure 5 million may not seem large when viewed next to the populations of countries such as Indonesia, it still represents almost twenty percent of the people in France. What it has done to this western nation is negatively impact it so severely that it may soon lose its European identity. In fact, if the birth rate continues as projected, France will have a Muslim majority in less than 25 years.
That is a direct quote from Thomas D. Segal, May 4, 2004. Because this frog lover doesn't want to do his research doesn't mean someone with a brain shouldn't, lol. But then...if he did his research, that would take him off his main goal of insulting Kender with that tired KKK meme slur. tsk tsk. Isn't Robert Byrd a well-known KKK member and isn't he a democrat? Isn't he the guy that severely opposed and hemmed and hawed over Condi's confirmation?
Geez, you'd think some of these people who get on the internet would have the sense to be able to put a couple of coherent thoughts together but--perhaps he's on his daddy's computer while daddy's not looking.
Very interesting, Kender. And, yes, Mr. Cobet, the facts are there, as Cao points out, to support this view of the future.
What I find amusing is Cobet's complaint about being "insulted" when he calls criticism of the French "racist". What? And the KKKender reference. It's amazing.
But this is what we get from the left these days. Ad hominem attacks, and a passionate defense of America's enemies.
And yet I have not once said anything about being "insulted", for this is the name-calling that is standard from the left...they can call names all day, yet let one from the right so much as say one peep that hints of an "insult" and watch them scream.
Want an insult leo? (BTW, you are NOT named well, as a Lion is a Noble Beast, and you are as far from noble as can be). Ok.
Here's your insult leo, created as I type, just for you;
"You seven sandwich eating son of a mattress thrashing cum-burping gutter slug."
Ooohhh...I called you AND Yo mama a name.....
"leo, simply because you lack the thought processes to understand the current situation in france, and indeed, the rest of europe to a lesser extent, does not mean that I am wrong.
There are far more people that see the truth of what I am saying than possess the lack of foresight you seem so gifted with....or rather, there are fewer people that lack foresight to your extent trolling my blog."
So, I'm supposed to convince myself you're right? Oh, and you just used something called argumentum ad numerum, which is a logical fallacy.
"Though the figure 5 million may not seem large when viewed next to the populations of countries such as Indonesia, it still represents almost twenty percent of the people in France. What it has done to this western nation is negatively impact it so severely that it may soon lose its European identity. In fact, if the birth rate continues as projected, France will have a Muslim majority in less than 25 years."
So, the Muslims are in a conspiracy to take over France and then kill everyone. Ever heard of something called the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?
"That is a direct quote from Thomas D. Segal, May 4, 2004. Because this frog lover doesn't want to do his research doesn't mean someone with a brain shouldn't, lol. But then...if he did his research, that would take him off his main goal of insulting Kender with that tired KKK meme slur. tsk tsk. Isn't Robert Byrd a well-known KKK member and isn't he a democrat? Isn't he the guy that severely opposed and hemmed and hawed over Condi's confirmation?"
blah..blah...blah..meme...Oh, and I am not Robert Byrd, so stop complaining about him to me. KKKender obvious has paranoid delusions about Muslims conquering Europe or something, so I think that qualifies him as a racist, don't you KKKao or whatever your name is?
I'll ignore the rest of your post as it is all ad hominem.
"logical fallacy"..."ad hominem"...catch phrases from the leftists that can't be defined and mean nothing....but at least now you are entertaining me.....so congrat's, you have surpassed plain stupid and now fall into the rarified domain of Carrottopitis....so stupidly entertaining that, like a car crash, you must be watched as one passes by on teh road of life.
Awesome stuff Kender! Absolute masterpiece!
Interesting set of comments Leo. First of all, the brits calling the French names is NOT racist in as much as they are the same race for the most part. Secondly, while it might be a little "ethno-centric" that is not the same as racism, if it is, you must castigate every partiotic person in every country and I've not heard you do that.
Lastly, it is not the 5 million muslims in france that is the problem, it is the population trend that lends credence to Kinders projections. And, while projections may be wrong, I haven't heard you say one thing regarding the poor projections of the left vis-a-vis the hundred thousand body bags of American troops in Iraq, or even the 10's of millions STARVING in Afghanistan all of which were projections of the left.
Checkmate, mate!
""logical fallacy"..."ad hominem"...catch phrases from the leftists that can't be defined and mean nothing"
"A logical fallacy is an error in logical argument which is independent of the truth of the premises. It is a flaw in the structure of an argument as opposed to an error in its premises."
"An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin, literally "argument [aimed] at the person", but usually translated as "argument to the man"), is a logical fallacy that involves replying to an argument or assertion by addressing the person presenting the argument or assertion rather than the argument itself..." Definitions coutesy of wikipedia. Ad hominems (a type of logical fallacy) were identified by Aristotle (who I have seen attributed with the invention of logic, and so presumably the identification of logical fallacies too), long before "leftists" existed, so don't act like we had to make up some nonsense words to make your arguments look stupid and invalid.
"....but at least now you are entertaining me.....so congrat's,"
"congrat's" That's a grammar error I don't think I ever would have made, much less in 8th grade (sorry if this is a bit confusing, other people, but it's a bit of a reference to an email KKKender sent me).
"you have surpassed plain stupid and now fall into the rarified domain of Carrottopitis....so stupidly entertaining that, like a car crash, you must be watched as one passes by on teh road of life."
Ooookay.
"Interesting set of comments Leo. First of all, the brits calling the French names is NOT racist in as much as they are the same race for the most part." You're right. It's actually nationalistic. Which is like racist, but instead of races, it involves nations. Nationalism is just another kind of bigotry. It's no better and no worse than any of the other kinds of bigotry. It is merely different.
"Secondly, while it might be a little "ethno-centric" that is not the same as racism, if it is, you must castigate every partiotic person in every country and I've not heard you do that."
Patriotism--what does it mean? "Love of one's country" sounds like a good definition, yes? Loving your country is fine with me. However, hating other countries is nationalism, not patriotism, and I declare to anyone who hates other nations: I castigate you!
"Lastly, it is not the 5 million muslims in france that is the problem, it is the population trend that lends credence to Kinders projections. And, while projections may be wrong, I haven't heard you say one thing regarding the poor projections of the left vis-a-vis the hundred thousand body bags of American troops in Iraq, or even the 10's of millions STARVING in Afghanistan all of which were projections of the left."
You have just committed the fallacy of composition (look it up if you don't know what it means--may I suggest wikipedia?). I have never said anything about starving children in Afghanistan. Nor have I said anything about 100,000 body bags in Iraq (although, let it be known that I am appalled by the deaths of 1700+ of our bravest citizens have been killed, along with deaths of between 22000 and 100000 Iraqi citizens (who we were supposed to rescue!)).
"Checkmate, mate!"
Uh, no.
PS, KKKender: "ad hominem" was originally used in this discussion by the nonleftist DC, so stop trying to pretend that the left has just fabricated some sort of logical fallacy out of nowhere because it's obviously good enough for the right too.
PS, GMRoper: You forgot an apostrophe. Perhaps KKKender can lend you the extra one he left in "congrats".
Dear Leonard 5,
You really seem to have a talent for talking and saying close to nothing.
Let me explain.
You're entire logical fallacy argument is nullified by your usage of them in the very text you use to accuse. I'm sure it's pretty fun for someone to try and pull logical fallacies out of thin air. Unfortunately, you missed a couple.
1. argumentum ad numerum - WRONG!
You used it to counter a statement about 20% of France's population being Muslim. It should be used in the event there is a group of people saying something. This is the "four out of five dentists agree" argument.
2. Racists. Isn't it funny that you're running around calling everybody a racist when you, yourself are guilty of the exact thing you are accusing Kender of? You DO subscribe to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" thing, right? Wouldn't that make you anti-Semitic, aka racist?
3. If you are tired of the same old "bash France" meme you know where the door is. Don't let it hit you where the good lord split you.
4. There are several countries in Europe that have enacted new legislation due to the growing population of Muslims in their own counties. Turkey is probably the best example of religious terrorism. Their entire government is structured so that the military can replace government if the church and state ever get too close. The most recent example was in 2003, when the U.S. wanted to use Turkey to access Iraq and they were denied. The military did a little house-cleaning project and the entire leading Islamic party were summarily fired.
Kender's concept is much more of a full on European fear in several countries, including England and especially France. Remember the secular fight they had in France over the head garb in class of a Muslim child, or is your memory selective?
Now that I've explained pretty much your entire argument do you see why I feel you are saying much adieu about nothing?
[Since it seems like everyone is doing it (ad numerum) it's my turn to hurl an ad hominem]
You self-subservient, sub-educated, sophomoric miscreant with an orally phallic fallacy problem.
[Does that work as ad hominem?]
You self-subservient, sub-educated, sophomoric miscreant with an orally phallic fallacy problem.
[Does that work as ad hominem?]
Not if you are calling them like you see them. ;-)
I'm just not completely sure why you use facts against such arguments from such silly people as this Leonard.
Do you think that if he reads enough facts that some will sink in?
Do you think that if he sees the facts he will change his mind?
Do you think that he can comprehend facts?
Do you think that he will only read your facts and turn them into his fantasy-world idea of facts?
Do you think he even knows what the word "fact" means?
Do you think that if you hit him in the head with a 2x4 fact that he'd notice?
"Dear Leonard 5,
You really seem to have a talent for talking and saying close to nothing.
Let me explain.
1. argumentum ad numerum - WRONG!
You used it to counter a statement about 20% of France's population being Muslim. It should be used in the event there is a group of people saying something. This is the "four out of five dentists agree" argument."
Actually, I was using it in response to the statement "There are far more people that see the truth of what I am saying" made by KKKender. So, I'm sorry you did not see what statement I was calling argumentum ad numerum, but I was in fact using it correctly.
2. "Racists. Isn't it funny that you're running around calling everybody a racist when you, yourself are guilty of the exact thing you are accusing Kender of? You DO subscribe to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" thing, right? Wouldn't that make you anti-Semitic, aka racist?"
NO I DO NOT! I brought it up in order to compare KKKender's paranoid fear of Muslims taking over France with the myth of the Jewish conspiracy.
"3. If you are tired of the same old "bash France" meme you know where the door is. Don't let it hit you where the good lord split you."
Ooookay.
"4. There are several countries in Europe that have enacted new legislation due to the growing population of Muslims in their own counties. Turkey is probably the best example of religious terrorism. Their entire government is structured so that the military can replace government if the church and state ever get too close."
Eh? It sounds to me like that means the military will step in to separate the church and state if they get too close--or at least that's the impression I get from your phrasing. Please, elaborate on this and whether it is good or bad.
"The most recent example was in 2003, when the U.S. wanted to use Turkey to access Iraq and they were denied. The military did a little house-cleaning project and the entire leading Islamic party were summarily fired."
That's good, right? Fewer religious extremists in control, right? (Also, why are you bringing up Turkey when France is the topic of discussion?)
"Kender's concept is much more of a full on European fear in several countries, including England and especially France. Remember the secular fight they had in France over the head garb in class of a Muslim child, or is your memory selective?"
I remember that. But translating headscarfs into a religious takeover is a bit much.
"Now that I've explained pretty much your entire argument do you see why I feel you are saying much adieu about nothing?"
Adieu or ado?
And you have not properly explained my argument (since you misinterpreted many statements of mine), so I don't really see what you mean.
"[Since it seems like everyone is doing it (ad numerum) it's my turn to hurl an ad hominem]"
Why are you using square brackets? Also you seem to be saying the following:
"Premise: Everyone is "doing it" ad numerum [whatever that's supposed to mean--square brackets in this case are used for me to insert my own commentary into this quotationed paraphrase of your post].
Conclusion: It is now okay for me to use the logical fallacy of the ad hominem"
So now you have just used a non sequiter
"You self-subservient, sub-educated, sophomoric miscreant with an orally phallic fallacy problem.
[Does that work as ad hominem?]"
Yes, and a slanderous one at that. (Why are you using square brackets?)
"I'm just not completely sure why you use facts against such arguments from such silly people as this Leonard.
Do you think that if he reads enough facts that some will sink in?
Do you think that if he sees the facts he will change his mind?
Do you think that he can comprehend facts?
Do you think that he will only read your facts and turn them into his fantasy-world idea of facts?
Do you think he even knows what the word "fact" means?
Do you think that if you hit him in the head with a 2x4 fact that he'd notice?"
Facts? This blog is a bit short on facts. There is a "current events" article that is over a year old, and also a few tidbits about Turkey and headscarfs. (There is also that obsolete IQ table, but that was just copy and pasted in by KKKender for the purposes of insulting or something). However, this blog is abundant with conclusions and predictions: Muslims will take over France and start killing people and stuff, etc.
What KKKender has failed to provide is the LOGIC to back up what he says.
It just occurred to me! I've been going about things the wrong way by trying to compare your views with the fabricated Jewish conspiracy in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It would be much more fitting to compare your fears with those of Tom Buchanan's. Tom Buchanan is a character from The Great Gatsby, BTW.
Wow, you're a stubborn bastard there leo...even after getting shredded by the Warmonger you come sliiming in for more.
How do you NOT see the logic behind the very likely outcome of a muslim majority in france?
Do you even read the news?
Are you not paying attention to what is going on in europe?
Do you know who Theo Van Gogh is?
And while I have your ear, (or eye as it were), do you know what is in a hotdog?
Once again you simply prove that your level of comprehension is lower than that of....you know what?
I have no idea what it would be that would have less comprehension than you that I would be willing to insult, as these days most everything and anybody has their own "defense group" watching for insults, slights and slander against them.
So maybe you should call whatever group is out there to defend tards, as you need the help.
And yes, that was a personal attack....
and oooooohhh...did we "slander" you leo????
Are you going to run our and get a lawyer?
Don't we have to "damage your rep" for slander to apply?
Is it even possible to damage the rep of a very amateur film critic?
That seems like saying it is possible to damage the rep of a used car salesman in Podunk.....you can't damage the rep of someone that doesn't have one
So true, Kender, or for that matter, someone who cannot refute the facts, rather his only argument seems to be about punctuation and the use of brackets. Oh, and quoting definitions out of the dictionary, now that makes him appear oh so intellectual and superior, doesn't it? So philosophical and deep... Square or round? That is the question.
"Leo the cryin" doesn't have much of a grip on reality, but he's quite entertaining, nevertheless.
If he could stop quoting peoples' entire comments and actually respond to them, maybe we'd get somewhere. But this is getting redundant and tiring; there's nothing new here and I SO need a latte and a massage *yawn*
You know what? Screw this. It's obvious that the car of this argument in which we are all passengers has crossed the border between Reasonland and Bickeringstan. And it was not headed into Reasonland.
Basically, you're never going to convince me of anything, and I'm never going to be able to convince you of anything. No one here could possibly gain anything by continuing to post. I have better things to do (like watch movies!) than posting here, and I'm sure you...uh...well, I'm sure the rest of you will find something productive to do with the time.
In departure, I would like to leave you with a quote that sums up the situation perfectly. Unfortunately, I couldn't find one, so here's something a golf commentator said once:
"One of the reasons Arnold Palmer is playing so well is that, before each tee shot, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them.... Oh my God, what have I just said?"
And have you ever seen a grown man naked?
(Sorry, couldn't resist)
So, do you like sports Billy?
Do you like gladiator movies?
No bickering, just facts:
Europe is afraid of the Muslim menace.
LINK
LINK
Nice long piece explaining islam from a Catholic perspective
LINK
Here's a reaction to the FRENCH (not Turkish you dumbass) ban on headscarves
LINK
Here's the history of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the hero of all Turks..didn't their countrie's name come from him?
LINK
Facts, just like you were too lazy or stupid to find. Kender's musings here were based on the fears of Europe with good reason.
Almost forgot one fact. The death of Christians in Muslim lands. We only need to look at Nigeria:
LINK
Or Saudi Arabia:
LINK
Of course, you'll probably ignore these facts, just as you ignored my facts before. If you don't believe this is a very real possibility take your family bible down the street of Saudi Arabia and see what happens...wait...don't. That would be a death sentance. I don't want to see liberal idiots die from their own stupidity. I may be mean, but I wouldn't wish that on anybody.
They whine, they bitch, they moan. But they keep coming back for more.
Definitely the definition of insanity: Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Yeah all these facts are bullshit and Leo the Whinin' is the center of the universe with his stupid rhetoric and his square brackets and dictionary definitions.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Kender, great future read here. I'm laughing right onto the floor.
Post a Comment